Tsuda Y, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Fushimi K, Kawano H, Tanaka S. Femoral metastatic fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. Gibbons CER, Pope SJ, Murphy JP, Hall AJ. A biomechanical comparison of various methods of stabilization of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Tencer AF, Johnson KD, Johnston DW, Gill K. A Biomechanical Comparison of Proximal Femoral Nails and Locking Proximal Anatomic Femoral Plates in Femoral Fracture Fixation: A Study on Synthetic Bones. Ozkan K, Türkmen I, Sahin A, Yildiz Y, Erturk S, Soylemez MS. A biomechanical comparison of a locking plate, a nail, and a 95° angled blade plate for fixation of subtrochanteric femoral fractures. 2012 470:684–91.įorward DP, Doro CJ, O’Toole RV, Kim H, Floyd JC, Sciadini MF, et al. Endoprostheses last longer than intramedullary devices in proximal femur metastases. Harvey N, Ahlmann ER, Allison DC, Wang L, Menendez LR. Orthopedic surgical management of skeletal complications of malignancy. Oncological and functional results after surgical treatment of bone metastases at the proximal femur. Safety aspects in surgical treatment of pathological fractures of the proximal femur – modular endoprosthetic replacement vs. J Med Assoc Thai 2007 90:1006-13.įakler JKM, Hase F, Böhme J, Josten C. The results of surgical management of bone metastasis involving the periacetabular area: Siriraj Experience. Wangsaturaka P, Asavamongkolkul A, Waikakul S, Phimolsarnti R. Intramedullary nailing for pathological femoral fractures. Sharma H, Bhagat S, McCaul J, MacDonald D, Rana B, Naik M. Most patients can ambulate with or without an assistive device at the final follow-up. Option that results in fewer perioperative and postoperative cardiopulmonary events and surgical complications. No hardware failureĬonclusion: For pathological fracture of the proximal femur, proximal femoral locking-plate fixation is a treatment Two patients required close postoperative monitoring in the intensive care unit due to poor preoperative status,Īnd both of those patients died within one month after surgery from other medical problems. Thirteen of 17 patients (76.5%) could walk with or without an assistive device at the time of final follow-up. No patient developed oxygen desaturation or cardiac arrest during the intraoperative or postoperative Ten of 17 patients (62.5%) had progressive lung disease from pulmonary metastasis or from The mean age of patients was 53.7 years (range: 28-89), and 12 of them were female. Results: Of the 18 femurs that were included, 13 were existing pathological fractures and 5 were impending fractures. Included operative duration, estimated blood loss, ambulatory status, hardware failure events, and postoperative Pathological fracture of the proximal femur were treated with proximal femoral locking-plate fixation. Materials and Methods: From 2007 to 2018, 17 patients (18 femurs) with a diagnosis of impending or existing The proximal femur relative to clinical results, implant failure, and surgical complications. Objective: To study the treatment outcomes of proximal femoral locking-plate fixation of pathological fractures of Outcomes proximal femur, locking-plate fixation, pathological fracture, LCP® Proximal Femur Plate Abstract Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.ĭepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |